Wednesday, October 26

Let 'em eat crow...

In another wonderful post, Jane Hamsher of Firedoglake manages to precisely put the hammer to the head of the nail. The blatant partisan hypocracy of the Right is indeed a bottomless pit.
Bill Frist (R-TN): To not remove President Clinton for grand jury perjury lowers uniquely the Constitution's removal standard, and thus requires less of the man who appoints all federal judges than we require of those judges themselves.

I will have no part in the creation of a constitutional double-standard to benefit the President. He is not above the law. If an ordinary citizen committed these crimes, he would go to jail.

Lindsey Graham: Should he be impeached? Very quickly; the hardest decision I think I will ever make. Learning that the president lied to the grand jury about sex, I still believe that every president of the United States, regardless of the matter they called to testify about before a grand jury should testify truthfully and if they don't they should be subject to losing their job.

I believe that about Bill Clinton and I'll believe that about the next president. If it had been a Republican, I would have still believed that and I would hope that if a Republican person had done all this that some of us would've went (sic) over and told him, You need to leave office.

Henry Hyde (R-ILL, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee): But when circumstances require you to participate in a formal court proceeding and under oath mislead the parties and the court by lying, that is a public act and deserves public sanction. Perjury is a crime with a five-year penalty.

James Sensenbrenner: (R-WI): What is on trial here is the truth and the rule of law. Our failure to bring President Clinton to account for his lying under oath and preventing the courts from administering equal justice under law, will cause a cancer to be present in our society for generations. I want those parents who ask me the questions, to be able to tell their children that even if you are president of the United States, if you lie when sworn "to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," you will face the consequences of that action, even when you don't accept the responsibility for them.

Chuck Hagel (R-NB): There can be no shading of right and wrong. The complicated currents that have coursed through this impeachment process are many. But after stripping away the underbrush of legal technicalities and nuance, I find that the President abused his sacred power by lying and obstructing justice. How can parents instill values and morality in their children? How can educators teach our children? How can the rule of law for every American be applied equally if we have two standards of justice in America--one for the powerful and the other for the rest of us?

Mitch McConnell (R-KY): Perjury and obstruction hammer away at the twin pillars of our legal system: truth and justice. Every witness in every deposition is required to raise his or her right hand and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help them God. Every witness in every grand jury proceeding and in every trial is required to raise his or her right hand and swear to tell the truth. Every official declaration filed with the court is stamped with the express affirmation that the declaration is true. In the words of our nation's first Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Jay: `if oaths should cease to be held sacred, our dearest and most valuable rights would become insecure.'
Sometimes just letting their own words speak for them is more than enough. But still it must be mentioned that seven years ago, during the Clinton Impeachment debacle, most of the arguements coming from the Left, though often legally torturous, did frequently agree that the President was wrong in what he did personally, albiet if not legally. His statements were not found to be material to the issue at hand, and not perjurious - the case itself was then thrown out as being without merit. Still many on the left did bash Clinton and bashed him hard, if someone what reluctantly, but for those on the right, can they possibly find the backbone to speak the truth about their President and his staff?

Apparently not, unless he does something completely freaking crazy... like appoint his favorite Office Secretary from down the hall to the Supreme Court.


1 comment:

Peteso said...

Hi there Vyan... Look where I landed searching for info on bankruptcy alternatives. But since Im here... I thought I'd just stop by and read... I found your post "Let 'em eat crow..." kinda interesting.
Do you always write that way?
I guess I'd better be on my way as I still need stuff on bankruptcy alternatives for my project.
Thanks for a good read Vyan ...and keep doing all the great blogs. Cheers.