Vyan

Saturday, April 10

Dan Lungren to Threatened Congresmen: Keep Quiet About it!

This just in from the Sacramento Bee: Republican Congressman Dan Lungren (CA-3) thinks other Congressmen and women who've had been harrased and had their lives threatened Doth Protest Too Much!

"We ought to kind of cool it in terms of the publicity of this stuff," Lungren said. "I don't think it serves any purpose other than maybe encourage some nutcases out there because they think they'll get publicity about it."


I really wonder whether the Rain flies upward in Opposite Land where Lungren Lives - but having been to Gold River, It's more likely that Dan is just used to standing on his head too much.

Let me get this straight... in the last few days there have been two arrests of persons threatening the LIVES - not just Shit-talking, but actively describing MURDER - of the Speaker of the House, and Washington Senator Patty Murray, and Lungren thinks their making too much of a big deal about it?

He uses a story from his own experience in Alexandria Va. to help illustrate his point.


On Easter morning in Alexandria, Va., a motorcyclist spotted the license plates on his car, then pulled up next to him and asked if he was a congressman. The Republican from Gold River said yes.

"He started using profanities and telling me how I was a criminal and I ought to go to jail," Lungren said. "Then he pulled the motorcycle to the other side of the car, where my wife was, and repeated the very same thing, to which my wife responded, 'Have a nice Easter.' "

Lungren said he didn't feel any particular need to publicize the harassment. And he wishes more of his colleagues would follow suit.


Seems to me that Lungren just publicized one his own threat here, hypocrite much?

But let's get to brass tacks here, someone saying "you should be arrested" is very different from saying "You Should Die", or worse "YOU'RE GONNA DIE - I'm going to see to it" which is exactly what occured with Senator Murray and Speaker Pelosi.

There's another good reason Dan didn't report it, if he'd whined about being heckled on the freeway every time it happened - he'd be laughed at.

Honeslty, I'm laughing right now.

Contrast that with the guy who was run off the road because he had an Obama sticker on his car.



Hey Dan, since you can obviously tolerate little harsh language let me be blunt- shit like this is called A Crime - and reporting it is a reponsibility, it's not optional, it's not whining, it's doing your civic duty. In this case it was a deliberate Hit and Run. The cutting of the gas line and the home of one Congressman's brother - Was also A CRIME, possibly even attempted murder of the residents of that house either from gas poisoning or a potential explosion.

These are Acts of Terrorism Daniel - and they shouldn't be taken lightly. Publicizing the fact that someone who committed a crime, and act of intimidation and Terrorism just went to jail for it actually does serve a purpose - it's called Deterrence. As opposed to your brilliant strategery which would be like telling a Rape Victim to shut the hell up or else she'll get Raped Again.

But Dan - who used to be California's Attorney General and should bloody well KNOW BETTER - thinks differently, besides apparently thinking that the best way to fight terrorism is to just stop talking about it so they just get bored and give up, he doesn't think the threats and the violence are steadily getting worse (whether anyone talks about those threats or not..)

"I have no evidence at this point that there is a steep rise in threats or that it's a more dangerous situation with respect to members of Congress," he said.

Lungren's assessment was challenged Friday by Democrats on the subcommittee.

"Discussions with members of Congress and law enforcement officials have shown increased incidents of threats directed at members," said House Administration Committee Chairman Robert Brady of Pennsylvania and Capitol Security Subcommittee Chairman Michael E. Capuano of Massachusetts, both Democrats, in a joint statement.

It's difficult to say who's right.


No, it's not that difficult, particularly when this story had an ad which specifically links to another story in the same paper from two days ago that proclaims Growing number of threats target federal lawmakers

Nice crack research staff you Sacbee guys got there, been spending too much too over at The Press Club getting your drink on afterhours guys? (I lived in Sac for 7 years, most of it about five blocks from the Bee - and sometimes worked at the Press Club - which is one block away - doing sound for local and touring bands) Here's some more from your own paper...

WASHINGTON -- The number of serious threats, including death threats, against members of Congress jumped in the past three months during the heated debate over the new health care law.

...

Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance W. Gainer, who monitors security in the House and the Senate, said lawmakers reported 42 incidents in the first three months of this year, nearly three times the 15 cases during the same time last year.


See, that wasn't hard was it? I understand the knee-jerk tendency to create false balance between opposing arguments and therefore not make Rep. Lungren look like a Fracking Idiot in his own hometown Newspaper, but unfortunately Lungren IS a Fracking Idiot and this little attempt at covering that fact up falls flat in one click.

More from the earlier article.

A threat to assault a member of Congress in retaliation for the performance of official duties is punishable by up to a year in prison.


See that Dan, it's not like getting the Hook pulled out on you for sucking on stage at The Apollo - like I said before, and I'll keep saying til it sinks in, it's a CRIME. Are you seriously arguing that members of Congress shouldn't be reporting CRIMES? How's that Rain taste as it goes up your nose?


The most notable police action was the arrest this week of Gregory Giusti, 48, of San Francisco, who police said was so angry over the health care act that he made at least 48 calls to Pelosi's homes and offices. Pelosi told the FBI the caller had used "extremely vulgar and crude language" on two occasions when she answered the phone at her Washington home.

Also this week, authorities in Yakima, Wash., arrested Charles Alan Wilson, 63, on a charge of threatening Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. In a phone conversation with an FBI agent posing as a member of a group opposing health care legislation, Wilson confirmed that he had made repeated calls to Murray and Washington's other Democratic senator, Maria Cantwell, and said, "I do pack, and I will not blink when I'm confronted. ... It's not a threat; it's a guarantee."

The third arrest involved a Philadelphia man charged with threatening in an Internet video to kill House Republican Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia. A court has ruled that Norman Leboon, 38, has multiple personalities and is not currently competent to stand trial.

In an e-mail to the campaign of Stephen Cohen, D-Tenn., one person wrote: "If our tea parties had hoods, we would burn your (expletive) on a cross an the White House front lawn."


Yeah, well - that would just go just fine and dandy with the Swastikas, Crescents, Joker Faces, and Hammer & Sickles you've already got - I think we all get the message loud and clear.

All except for Dan that is.

Pardon me if I sound a little peeved, I am - You should be too.

Vyan

Join the Democratic Non-Violence Project Today and help us contact our Lawmakers and have them to Pledge to take a 100% Stand Against Political Violence or else look as Stupid and Clueless as Dan does right now.

Friday, April 9

The Democratic Non-Violence Project Starts Now!

Watching this discussion between Keith Olbermann and Chris Hayes of that Nation I was struck with the apparently inherent quandary of free and open society which treasures and values free speech, yet abhors violence. We want people to be as open and vocal as possible, yet we do not want people to turn incendiary rhetoric into violent and incendiary action. Yet that is exactly what has been occurring and will continue to occur, unless we take a stand and demand that others either stand with us - or stand exposed as the hate and violence mongers they are.



As of today, as of now - I have started the Democratic Non-Violence Project beginning with a FaceBook Page of the same name, the goal of which is to circulate a pledge - as was suggested by Chris Hayes - to each and every member of Congress, to each and Governor, to each and every State Legislator to Formally RENOUNCE ALL FORMS OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE.



It should be a no brainer.

It should go without saying.

But apparently, after two men were recently arrested making Death Threats against sitting members of Congress, after another attempted to sabotage the gas line at what he believed was another Congressman's Home, after a bullet landed through the window of the House GOP Whip (regardless of the sketchy details) it does needs to be said - and Loudly!

We all have a right to speak our minds. Under the law, and the Brandenburg Standard we are all protected up to the point where we suggest and call for imminent violence against our fellow Americans. That is the line we must not cross, yet so many in our political sphere have for too long felt comfortable tip-toeing up to that line and shouting FIRE as loud as they can for political and/or financial gain, then shrugging as people are trampled in the ensuing stampede.

NO MORE.

It's time, before we are forced to bury more people - like those who were killed at the Knoxville Unitarian Church or the Guard at the Holocaust Museum - who have become the victims of political violence, to take a stand and to say NO MORE.

Here is a first draft of The Pledge!


Whereas our nation is founded upon the protection of free and open debate...

Whereas the primary goal of the democratic process is to emphasize the power of the ballot over the power of the bullet, the power of persuasion over the power of intimidation, the power of One Good Idea over the Power of One Cheap Insult, and the power of a hopeful future over the dread of fear and terror-filled past...

I ________ hereby pledge myself to the cause of Democratic Non-Violence, Renouncing and Denouncing ALL Forms of Political Violence, Terrorism and Intimidation, as well as the use of Racial, Religious and Personal Epithets as being Poisonous to the Well of Free Speech that our Nation is Founded upon and can not survive without. Our nation will live on together, debating and arguing loudly and peacefully to become a more perfect union day by day, year by year. I swear I will do all I can to make it so.


Those people who address the public and each other on political subjects have a Responsibility to make it clear and unequivocal where they stand on the subject of political violence. This is a simple black and white issue - regardless of Party, regardless of Creed - you either stand AGAINST VIOLENCE or by your silence - you stand WITH IT.

EVERYONE IN PUBLIC DISCOURSE SHOULD BE ASKED TO TAKE THE PLEDGE and show where they stand.

And By "Democratic" I mean the democratic process by which we govern this Republic, not the Democratic Party (which the Righties call the "Democrat" party anyway - so they shouldn't get confused - although they might.)

It's time we made all of our politicians, Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, Green Party, Socialists and yes - even The Tea Party. Especially the Tea Party - pledge themselves to the cause of Democratic Non-Violence, or else reveal their true allegiances.

Yes, that's right I WANT Tea Partiers to pledge themselves. Are you with Non-Violence or are you against it? Put yourself on the record, if you don't like being associated with people who would shoot at police or try to blow them up, fly their plane into the IRS Building, shoot up a Unitarian Church, Kill an OB/GYN, call Rep John Lewis "Nigger", Rep Barney Frank "Faggot", or Rep. Eric Cantor "Kike" - either in the past or the future - PLEDGE YOURSELF to this cause.

With the face book page up now, I soon hope to launch a full-fledged site/blog page on April 19th, the Anniversary of the Waco Tragedy and the Oklahoma City Bombing.

I'm going to need all of your help to spread the world, call members of Congress to take the pledge.

The Non-Violence Starts Now.

Vyan

Wednesday, March 31

President Obama On the Passage of Health Reform

History has Come!

Scott McClellan and David Frum rip tea parties as extreme, bad for GOP

Yes, there are some Conservatives and Republicans who aren't completely Off their Meds - unfortunately they've been excommunicated by the rest of the party, A shame.

Friday, March 19

Targeted by the Tea Party: Parkinson's Hero Speaks

Bob, the man with Parkinson's who was targeted by the Tea Partiers, sat down with ProgressOhio for an interview. He is 60 years old and was first diagnosed with Parkinsons 15 years ago. He has two masters degrees and a Ph.D. from Cornell. He taught at the University of Michigan and worked as a nuclear engineer.

Bob was able to have a $150,000 surgery that greatly increased his quality of life, thanks to Medicare and the Cleveland Clinic. He attended the event in Columbus because he believes in giving back and thinks everyone should have access to affordable health insurance and quality health care.

Thursday, March 18

Tea Partiers Mock And Scorn Apparent Parkinson's Victim

This is what the Tea Parties are really about and just what the really think of the Sick and Needy

"No More Hand-Outs!!"

Sunday, March 7

Myspace Player for Re-Evolutionize Now Available

Here's the Myspace Song Player for my debut CD - Re-Evolutionize. All tracks can be streamed, added to a Myspace Profile/Playlist and Mp3's Purchased Online.

..

Friday, March 5

Christian Hate Group Terrorizes Amarillo Texas


Calling themselves "Repent Amarillo" a group of self-identified "Christians" connected with Raven Ministries has organized a Militia Group which has been going around town stalking and harassing "Sinners" (i.e. Gays, Muslims, Swingers, Liberals) as shown in the following video.



Please note, no one in this club even if you may find it a bit skeevy is breaking any laws ("consenting adults") yet they've been stalked and outed - some have even lost their jobs due to "Repent Amarillo".

Bet if they made this Club an ABC Reality Show, these guy would eat it up!

The most disturbing thing about this group is their self-proclaimed "Army of God" moniker, besides the fact their already is a group called Army of God who are directly connected to various bombings of gay clubs (including the Atlanta Olympic Park bombing) and shootings of OB/GYN's (like Dr. George Tiller), the term actually translate into - wait for it - Hezbollah.

In addition to their stalking of the Swingers Club, "Repent Amarillo" has also gone to lengths to have a play about Gay people during Nazi Germany completely shutdown. Via Thinkprogress

Repent has struck with some success at many of its enemies within the town. A community theater attempted to open “Bent,” a play about the persecution of homosexuals during Nazi Germany. But the day before opening night, Repent members helped shut down the play by calling in fire marshals to complain about the theater’s permit. Staffers at a nature preserve were featured on local news defending themselves against Repent accusations that their site represents something related to witchcraft.


Witchcraft? Witchcraft?! Seriously, Witchcraft?

Do these guys even know that Harry Potter is just a Movie? (Clearly these guys don't READ!)

If they did read it's obvious these guys don't seem to be reading from the same bible the rest of us have been reading. Seems to me, if you're going to call yourself "Christian" - you should be paying attention to the teaching of Jesus The Christ.

If you believe Levitican law as laid down by Moses, then Adultery and Homosexuality are sins. They are Abominations:


Leviticus 18:29
For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.

Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Leviticus 18:20
Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour's wife, to defile thyself with her.

Leviticus 20:10
And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.



You know what else is an abomination? Eating Shellfish and "Creepy" things.

Leviticus 11:10
And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

Leviticus 11:20
All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you.

Leviticus 11:42
Whatsoever goeth upon the belly, and whatsoever goeth upon all four, or whatsoever hath more feet among all creeping things that creep upon the earth, them ye shall not eat; for they are an abomination.


Fortunately we have something called Refrigeration now, but what does that mean for Football Players who are constantly touching a "Pigskin"?

What else is an abomination>? Doing it with a woman, when she's got the Curse

Leviticus 20:13
And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness; he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood: and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.


Y'know Jesus was actually asked about these things, and most of us know what he ultimately said about Adultery. Then again may be don't.

But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.


Get that, Divorced People getting remarried to someone else are Adulterers. Gee I hope nobody in "Repent Amarillo" has ever been divorced the way that Newt Gingrich and Karl Rove have been several times.

And what did Jesus do with Adulterers? From John 8:



3And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

4They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

5Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

6This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

7So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

8And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

9And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

10When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

11She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.


Ok, Ok, but what about Teh Ghey? Doesn't Jesus Hate Teh Ghey? Well, Maybe not according to Matthew 19

3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.

11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.


Here Jesus argues that Moses was WRONG to allow for divorce, and as I stated above states that anyone who marries a second time - is an adulterer. He also says people are "born eunuchs: from their mother's womb". I may be going a stretch, but that seems to suggest that some men are BORN WITHOUT AN ATTRACTION TO WOMEN.

Also I see nothing in here that condemns women who are attracted to other women. Inconsistent much? Either way, the one consistent thing in Jesus teachings was the power and value of forgiveness, not condemnation.

Luke 7:37 - And behold, a woman of the city, who was a sinner, when she learned that he was at table in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster flask of ointment, 38 and standing behind him at his feet, weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment.

39 Now when the Pharisee who had invited him saw it, he said to himself, "If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what sort of woman this is who is touching him, for she is a sinner." 40 And Jesus answering said to him, "Simon, I have something to say to you." And he answered, "What is it, Teacher?"

41 "A certain creditor had two debtors; one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. 42 When they could not pay, he forgave them both. Now which of them will love him more?" 43 Simon answered, "The one, I suppose, to whom he forgave more." And he said to him, "You have judged rightly."


The bottom line is that these people aren't "Christians" at all, they don't understand the first THING about Jesus' teachings - they're merely a bunch of Thugs trying to push people around and dictate how they think other people should behave against their will.

It's despicable.

What's next tossing acid into the faces of school girls for failing to "Honour their Mother and Father?" with sassy back talk?

And it's not just in Texas where teh crazy is spreading.



A Louisiana sheriff plans to arm volunteers with shotguns, riot shields, batons, and a .50-caliber machine gun mounted on a "war wagon," as part of "Operation Exodus," a program to provide security in the event of a terrorist attack or civic unrest. "It's a calling," he says.

The office of Sheriff Larry Deen of Bossier Parish, near Shreveport in the northwest part of the state, last month selected for the program 200 local residents -- mostly ex-law-enforcement personnel -- and began training them in "defensive techniques in the event of a struggle," reports the Shreveport Times. The plan calls for the new recruits to be sent to protect food from grocery stores, gas from gas stations, and other crucial local resources, should the situation demand it.


Gee, where have I seen a bunch of armed white militant people in the middle of a Louisiana Crisis before - oh yeah, on the Streets of New Orleans during Katrina.



Just like the Anti-Government Truther Conspiracy Theorist Right-Wing Nutbag who Shot up the Pentagon Yesterday - The Militant American Taliban is real, and it is Dangerous.

Vyan

More from a Previous Diary on this.