Vyan

Friday, February 20

Did anyone actually LISTEN to what Eric Holder said about Racial Cowardice?

Attorney General Eric Holder's recent comments have generated a firestorm of reaction - particularly in this now famous exchange between Pat Buchannan and Dr. Michael Eric Dyson.



In this both Buchanan and the host attempt to dictate the terms in which Holder should have been speaking. He can't talk about Racial problems without first attacking the black community for it's own problems, as if those problems exist in complete isolation and just appeared magically on their own in no relation to anything else in America. Dr Dyson attempted to respond amid technical problems.


But what has any of this got to do with what Holder was actually talking about?

His text of his actual remarks are Here.

Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards. Though race related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race. It is an issue we have never been at ease with and given our nation’s history this is in some ways understandable. And yet, if we are to make progress in this area we must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other, to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us. But we must do more- and we in this room bear a special responsibility. Through its work and through its example this Department of Justice, as long as I am here, must - and will - lead the nation to the "new birth of freedom" so long ago promised by our greatest President. This is our duty and our solemn obligation.


He is not addressing Black on Black Crime here, and there is no law or requirement - despite what Buchanan believes - that any discussion of race must begin as Black people taking a huge mea culpa as Bill Cosby has recently done, partcularly when he's not just talking about black people and white people.

He is not addressing White Guilt.

He doesn't say here, the it's all White people's Fault or Responsibility - he's simply pointing out that we DON'T SERIOUSLY TALK ABOUT THESE THINGS, certainly not without getting into finger pointing and defensiveness, which is exactly what happened on Hardball.

His point was, that we continue - 50 years after Brown v Board of Ed. - to voluntarily segregate ourselves.

As a nation we have done a pretty good job in melding the races in the workplace. We work with one another, lunch together and, when the event is at the workplace during work hours or shortly thereafter, we socialize with one another fairly well, irrespective of race. And yet even this interaction operates within certain limitations. We know, by "American instinct" and by learned behavior, that certain subjects are off limits and that to explore them risks, at best embarrassment, and, at worst, the questioning of one’s character. And outside the workplace the situation is even more bleak in that there is almost no significant interaction between us. On Saturdays and Sundays America in the year 2009 does not, in some ways, differ significantly from the country that existed some fifty years ago. This is truly sad. Given all that we as a nation went through during the civil rights struggle it is hard for me to accept that the result of those efforts was to create an America that is more prosperous, more positively race conscious and yet is voluntarily socially segregated.


He didn't specifically say here whether he was speaking about white people or black people - because he was speaking to BOTH!

Let me take a second to paraphrase at least from my own perspective

White People : DO NOT BE AFRAID to speak your mind. Even if you think you might be accused of bigotry, it's better to get it out there and let it be addressed and responded to. Doing so takes Courage as well as trust.

Black people : Don't just LIVE IN YOUR OWN WORLD, get out and mingle. Not just as a way to advance your career and finances, but just to see what everyone else is really about and what they're truly like. Doing so takes Courage, to take the risk that some of your worries and fears about residual racism and covert bigotry might be true - and they might not!.

This is test they we have to take each and everyday, with each and every person - One At A Time - that is where we have been cowards.

In this I speak from personal experience, I'm a black musician who is a fan and performer of Hard Rock Music - and trust me, there are NOT a lot of other black people out their voluntarily getting involved in what many people perceive as "White Culture", particularly Rock. (I know rock isn't "White" Music, but that really is the perception) It takes courage to go out amongst people you have almost nothing in common with and take the risk of facing ridicule and ostrazation for being different - particularly when you are in the vast minority. Just like with anti-trust situations, the Majority always has an advantage even if they don't always recognize it - and that's freedom from fear!.

Eric's point and he was absolutely correct is that outside of work or school we all retreated from each other, into our own comfort zones, into generalities or into statistics as Buchanan has done.

As Pat says, the numbers tell us that young Black men are Seven Times more Violent and Criminal than young White men.

Those figures come from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and I know them well.


# Lifetime chances of a person going to prison are higher for

-- men (11.3%) than for women (1.8%)
-- blacks (18.6%) and Hispanics (10%) than for whites (3.4%)

# Based on current rates of first incarceration, an estimated 32% of black males will enter State or Federal prison during their lifetime, compared to 17% of Hispanic males and 5.9% of white males.


The funny part is the Pat is getting it wrong. (Update:: In fact, most of his numbers came right out of his ass particularly the bit about 45% of black crime being against whites. The FBI Uniform Crime Report doesn't include cross-racial incidents unless it's Murder or a Hate Crime - which is just another name for Domestic Terrorism - and black people are proportionally BY FAR on the receiving end of both... but I digress)

18.6% divided by 3.4% is not 7 - it's only 5.47 to 1, not 7 to 1. (Even if Pat is exaggerating, that's still a significant difference)

But what does that mean really, because if you use the same figures for men and women you get a ratio of 6.2 to 1 - so should Men be more like Women in their criminality as Pat suggests Black's should be more like Whites? Should we walk around in constant fear of men? Should we bash them to "straighten out their act!?"

The thing is, this the per capita number of people who've are likely to be arrested, convicted and imprisoned - not necessarily the accurate number of criminals. The thing that Pat leaves out, is that fact that Law Enforcement continues to specifically Target Black people (believing as does Pat, that they are more likely to be "criminals" is an act of Cowardice!)

The numbers, in general, say one thing: It's takes a personal act of Courage to find out if the generalization is true on a case by case, individual by individual basis.

America has been lacking in that courage.

Pat also ignores the gross disparity in sentencing laws which send black defendants to jail for as much as 100 Times for essentially the same crime, so in many ways we aren't talking about more criminals - we're talking about people being held in prison much, much longer.

Few people have been able to accurately quantify the impact on both profiling and sentencing disparities, but simple logic tells you that if you acknowledge either these factors the simplistic "Blacks are Seven Times more Criminal" argument doesn't pass the smell test.

Let's just go on to point out that it's pretty hard to hold down a job when you've been in prison. It's pretty hard to keep a family together when you can't keep a job. Yes, Black people have a disproportionate number of out-of-wedlock birth's, maybe that's because so many black women have had to learned - the hard way - that their man may not being around all the time, voluntarily or not. Maybe a lot of Black men, knowing the figures and the odds as they are so often drilled into our heads - have for so long simply given up all hope!

"Hope" can be folly of fools when all reality tells you something completely different. Maybe the acendency of Barack Obama to the Presidency will rekindle that "Hope", maybe it will "Keep Hope Alive" and maybe not. We'll see - it's only been a month.

Now, the mistake that black people (and others) make is automatically assuming that anyone who brings up these problems with criminality or other issues - has to be a Racist as has been thrown quite a bit at Pat lately.

That isn't necessarily the case.

Well, ok, it might be the case for Pat and maybe some of the people at the New York Post who can't even apologize without insulting people again - but there are a lot of other people who look at these figures, they look at the poverty, the alcoholism, drug addiction rates and go "Why should I care about these people if they don't care about themselves?"

It's a legitimate question, and deserves a legitimate answer beyond simply saying "White People Did It To US!" (Well ok, maybe some of them did but those white people are largely gone - what about the people that are here now?)

Sometimes white people just honestly don't understand where black people are coming from with all this (i think legitimate) anger and angst over these GENERATIONAL problems, and we (black people, if you forgot, I'm one of y'all) need to give them an honest chance to let their frustrations out. They're tired of being BLAMED for everything that's wrong in Black America. We have to understand that, we have to have the Courage to trust that simply dealing with that guilt doesn't make someone a "Closet Racist" (They have to ACT on it for that!)

It's not all their fault.

Really, it's not. And the finger-pointing contest is not helping.

Many white people, and frankly most immigrants don't see what Black people's problem is. "Just get over it! My parents/grand-parents had to suffer too" Why can't you just be like us!?. Well the simple answer to that is something that Dr. Dyson was trying to say - but was cut-off by the technical problems. Black people didn't just decide to have seperate schools, and seperate colleges and seperate churches and seperate music and a seperate distinct and unique culture - THEY HAD TO! Everything they did have as Africans, was taken from them by Force - their language, their families and culture. All gone. All destroyed.

Take a second and really think about that.

Now, imagine several dozen generations - literally it has been 400 years since Virginia instituted Race-Based Slavery - and realize we've had a completely seperate a parallel nation going for that entire time.
And now, many of you, just want us to just Chuck it all!? simply because that's pretty much what most immigrants do, tamped down their native culture in order to fit more comfortably into the melting pot?

Yeah, but what if 80-90% of your culture - CAME FROM AMERICA? Fact is: We already are Americans. We're supposed to have Freedom Of choice. Think about what's really being asked here when people suggest Black people's real problem - is that they Act Too Black!

If you or your family has immigrated from somewhere else voluntarily, you've already volunteered to join the existing American cultural structure - you already made that choice. Black people didn't. Demanding them to do that now is nothing short of Culture-cide. It's despicable.

But again, this isn't about blame, it's about the future.

Yes, Black people have suffered through both Slavery, Jim Crow and segregation. I'm old enough that is has touch me in my lifetime, some younger people not so much - but they've know there parents did and as most parent do - they tend to pass on down. Everyone needs to understand that this multi-generational trauma does have a lasting impact even today. When you apply pressure to any object it reacts in one of two ways, either it collapses or it explodes into action. Like a leak in a dam or a firehose, the kind of pressure that Jim Crow applied on Black people drove many of them forward to achieve - to excel as did the the Buffalo Soldiers, the Tuskegee Airmen, Benjamin Carver and hundreds of other Black inventors, athletes, musicians and artists from Jackie Robinson, Little Richard, Ray Charles to Jimi Hendrix and yes, even Bill Cosby.

These people burst forward, but not everyone is capable of that. Not Everyone can or will react that way. Many of us were crushed by the experience emotionality, spiritually and mentally and we've continue to pass that on to our children, and to their children. That's not caused by "racism", that's just inertia - like a perpetual motion engine of self-destruction.

It's therefore not that surprising that the cultural artists and musicians who originally inspired us to find alternatives to urban despair have now become immersed in it themselves. We went from Afrika Bambatta and Grand Master Flash giving us "The Message" to T.I., Left Eye (Burning down the House!), the Esst/West Rap Wars and embarassment of R. Kelly and Michael Jackson.

We don't need White people to tear us down anymore, we learned a long time ago to exactly how to do it to ourselves. We do need to face that and change it.

Black culture - as separate as it has been by necessity - has included both the light and the dark, the destroyed and the super-energized. It's going to take more than a single generation to reconcile it's two distinct, and often internally feuding, halves.

Also it's too simple to say either that "White People Made Us this Way" or that "Black people need to clean up their own house".

We made this mess together. America did it. Not just White America, not just Black America - AMERICA! We need to address urban crime, we also need to address profiling and serious sentencing problems. We need to address the meaning of modern day "blackness" and what it means to be An American (Terrorist Fist Bump? Stokeley Carmichael in a Dress?!) and we need to not let our History become an albatross, clouding our future in perpetual guilt, shame and blame.

The way out of it is together. With Courage. Eric Holder knows this - we should try a little harder to listen:

As a nation we should use Black History month as a means to deal with this continuing problem. By creating what will admittedly be, at first, artificial opportunities to engage one another we can hasten the day when the dream of individual, character based, acceptance can actually be realized. To respect one another we must have a basic understanding of one another. And so we should use events such as this to not only learn more about the facts of black history but also to learn more about each other. This will be, at first, a process that is both awkward and painful but the rewards are potentially great. The alternative is to allow to continue the polite, restrained mixing that now passes as meaningful interaction but that accomplishes little. Imagine if you will situations where people- regardless of their skin color- could confront racial issues freely and without fear. The potential of this country, that is becoming increasingly diverse, would be greatly enhanced. I fear however, that we are taking steps that, rather than advancing us as a nation are actually dividing us even further. We still speak too much of "them" and not "us". There can, for instance, be very legitimate debate about the question of affirmative action. This debate can, and should, be nuanced, principled and spirited. But the conversation that we now engage in as a nation on this and other racial subjects is too often simplistic and left to those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own, narrow self interest.



LOOK at what he's saying here - LOOK - it's not about "Us vs Them" - it's not going to be simple or easy, the process may be "akward and painful" (Ya got that right bruthah!)- but we can't afford to turn away and retreat into neutral (seperate and still unequal) corners.

We have to engage each other, not just when we circumstances and proximity force us, but because we want to - we need to.

Vyan


You, love you're "kind" so much
And try to pretend, they're all so grand
But if you were to travel back "home"
Would they kick your ass
Back to this "this land"?

...

Gonna take all I can get now
For the best life
(just) Haven't found it yet

(Chorus)
Refugee
Refugee
(You're) Nothing but a Refugee in Paradise


From the song "Refugee" - by Me!

Thursday, February 19

Crazy so thick, you can cut it with a dull butter knife

This tour-de-force of the stupid-train brought to you by Michelle (We-Should-have-an-Anti-American-Test-For-Congress) Bachmann as she claims that the Stimulus package will allow Obama to redistrict the nation at will, give $4 billion to Acorn, ration healthcare, and naturally steal truckloads of money from republicans and give it to democrats. (The Deep, Dark Liberal Ultimate Plan!)



Olbermann: Is she a) dumb, b) crazy or c) politically brilliant?

Hayes: This sounds like someone who gets the entirety of their politics for Rush Limbaugh and Townhall.com. (She is) one of these people who exists solely in this really intense, ideologically extreme, fervent, sheltered, inbred, sub-culture of real hard right-wingery!
...

Like a stew, the Republican party is being boiled off, and reduced, and reduced...(She's) like the demiglas of wing-nuttia!


I think Hayes may have more than a bit of a point.

After decades of the rational republicans being essentially run out of the party on rail - with the exception of the Maine delegation and Arlen Specter - all the we have left are the super-wingnuts like Bachmann, Palin, Michael (Government Never Made a Job) Steele, Ted (It's a Series of Tube!) Stevens, and Eric Cantors left.

This isn't just a mere matter of a honest difference of opinion. It's worse than flat-out willful ignorance and disinformation - some of these people are completely off their nut.

And after getting whomped in two elections in a row - they're just getting worse, not better.

You've got Rick (Man-on-Dog) Santorum saying that the Qu'ran is written in "Islamic" instead of Arabic. That's like saying the King James Bible is written in Anglican, rather than the King's English.

Or this example from Hardball with J.D. Hayworth (via The Young Turks) arguing that the economic meltdown is all the fault of Chuck Schumer and Goerge Soros!



Matthews: Would you like 8 more years of the same policies?

Hayworth: I'd like lower taxes and a strong economy, yes.

Matthews: But that's not what we had. We have a mess.

Hayworth: Well, that's the fault of Chuck Schumer...(incoherrent) George Soros manipulating the currency...(incoherrent babble)... Indy mack...(blah blah blah)

Matthews: You can talk fast, but I don't know what you're talking about... George Soros?

Ford: This is why Barack Obama won.

Uyger: That clip was critical, because he can't answer the question. It's like you're so dense you can't understand simple evidence and facts. (Indy Mac amd Schumer) was a pimple on the elephants ass. Your Elephant's Ass. This republican party is absolutely, positively intellectually bankrupt. They got nothing left in the tank. They're like an old witch Doctor - every answer is "leaches". Got a problem - get a leach. We'll suck those tax cuts right out of you.


The Republican Party is circling the drain, and all they seem to be able to do - turn into the spin and go down faster

But what we have to realize is that these people are all just a slice of a portion of America that is slowly losing it's collective mind. Their embracing of Joe the-Unlicenced-tax-dodging-incurious Plumber/Pundit is not an aberration - it's their destiny because they see themselves reflected in Joe's dull dead-behind the frontal-lobe eyes. Bachmann stays in Office because, if she's anything, she is Joe Duh Plumber in a pantsuit.

It's not just the elected leaders, the entire party has become hijacked by nothing but the Dittoheads and Palinites who still believe - despite all fact and common sense that Obama is a "Socialist Muslim" who Palled Around with Terrorists, or it's people who believe and agree with the rants of the Knoxville Liberal-Are-Evil Gunman - like this recent post I received from a alleged "Paster" on my own personal blog after I brought up Domestic Terrorist Eric Rudolph the Olympic Park Bomber.


Don't tell me about Eric Rudolph. At least he stopped the babykilling abortionist from murdering any more children. What have you done to stopped these babies from being murdered?

How many straight children have been molested and murdered by homosexuals like you? A lot. How many Christians have been assaulted by homosexuals like you because you didn't like the way they voted? A lot. How many Christian churches have been burned down by homosexuals like you because you disagree with the Holy Bible? A lot. Matthew Shepard is in eternal hell fire now and will never get out.

Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God's Word and will one day have to pay the price for not believing what God has written.


Scary no? These guys are deep and serious denial and delusion. It's not a debate, or open exchange of contrasting ideas - this is a dangerous, contagious, pathological social disorder. You can't argue people out of this, they have to slowly, painfully come back to reality on their own. Some never will. The sooner we come to realize that, the better.

In the meantime, at this rate and direction the Republican Party is doomed.

Couldn't happen to a better bunch of nutballs.

Vyan


You think you have every answer ready
You hear the news, but you just refuse to believe
What it means

You'll never see it
'till your World Comes Tumbling Down
You'll never know it
'till your Nose is shoved right to the ground
You'll never hear it


From the Song "Tumbling Down" by Me!

Tuesday, February 17

Yoo, Bybee may be Disbarred for Torture Memos

Last night on Rachel, Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff revealed that an internal DOJ OPR report strongly criticizes the various memo's justifying and excusing "Enhanced Interrogation" techniques as "sloppy and "unethical".



But it gets even worse, Isikoff explains...

First there is the fact that former Attorney General Mukasey deliberately delayed the report

Mr. Jarrett’s office completed a draft report late last year, but Michael B. Mukasey, the attorney general at the time, and his deputy, Mark R. Filip, insisted that it not be considered final until written responses from Mr. Yoo, Judge Bybee and Mr. Bradbury could be incorporated. The three are now in the process of submitting their responses, according to an official who agreed to speak about the internal report only on condition of anonymity.

Officials said the report assesses the reasoning used in justifying the harsh methods and pressure from the White House to reach particular conclusions. The Office of Professional Responsibility can refer cases for criminal investigation, but legal experts say a more likely possibility is a referral to bar associations for potential disciplinary action.


I think it might be somewhat difficult to continue serving on the Federal Bench - as Jay Bybee currently does - if you aren't a lawyer anymore. (He coule possibly be Impeached!) The same goes for John Yoo who is currently "teaching" law at Berkeley and being on staff at Chapman University). (Correction: Apparently NOT - Yoo has tenure at Berkeley, and would need to be convicted of a crime to be booted!)

Once these responses are received, hopefully, the final report will land on the desk of AG Eric Holder who has already stated not only is Waterboarding is Torture, but that the President doesn't have some "Magical Article 2 Power" to make torture legal with the wave of his pen.



In his appearance on Rachel, Isikoff suggests that the reason disbarment may be the recommendation of the report may be because rather than being the honest opinion and result of an honest view of the law, the opinions from Yoo, Bybee and their boss Steven Bradbury may have been specifically crafted to reach the White Houses desired conclusions. Apparently the reports doesn't recommend prosecution - but if it did there are plenty of fertiles grounds. If Isikoff is correct, the memos weren't legal guidance for the White House to follow - they were excuses and legal cover for the White House to get away with War Crimes.

If that's true - It could be prosecuted as Conspiracy under 18 USC 2441.

(A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.


What happens when you violate 2441? This:

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.


The ACLU has just released formerly classified documents uncovering at least two detainees who were beaten and tortured to death at Bagram AFB in AFghanistan. If - and that's a BIG IF - the tactics used can be traced back to techniques authorized by Bush under justifications provided by Yoo, Bybee and Bradbury - we're talking Grey-bar Hotel and maybe even Old Sparky for the lot of them.

Investigation of two deaths at Bagram. Both detainees were determined to have been killed by pulmonary embolism caused as a result of standing chained in place, sleep depravation and dozens of beatings by guards and possibly interrogators. (Also reveals the use of torture at Gitmo and American-Afghani prisons in Kabul )


The OPR reports doesn't attempt to make such a connection - but perhaps someone should. Particularly since previously released autopsy reports show that those two were only the tip of the iceberg.

""There is no question that U.S. interrogations have resulted in deaths,"" said Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU. ""High-ranking officials who knew about the torture and sat on their hands and those who created and endorsed these policies must be held accountable. America must stop putting its head in the sand and deal with the torture scandal that has rocked our military.""

The documents released today include 44 autopsies and death reports as well as a summary of autopsy reports of individuals apprehended in Iraq and Afghanistan. The documents show that detainees died during or after interrogations by Navy Seals, Military Intelligence and ""OGA"" (Other Governmental Agency) -- a term, according to the ACLU, that is commonly used to refer to the CIA.

According to the documents, 21 of the 44 deaths were homicides. Eight of the homicides appear to have resulted from abusive techniques used on detainees, in some instances, by the CIA, Navy Seals and Military Intelligence personnel. The autopsy reports list deaths by ""strangulation,"" ""asphyxiation"" and ""blunt force injuries."" An overwhelming majority of the so-called ""natural deaths"" were attributed to ""Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.""


Yoo, Bybee and Bradbury have alot to answer for - but then Justice is probably far too much to expect. At the very least we can hope for an Independant Counsel for War Crimes! (Crossing fingers) Pretty Please Mr. Holder?

Vyan


In the name of the Holy
The greatest sins are done
The righteous point a finger
Like the barrel of a gun


From the song "Justified" by ME!

Lansing Mayor Takes Faux News to School!




Why is it the working people, the people who actually make things, always have to take it in the shorts - what about Wall Street? Why isn't there some Reciprocity?


In response to The Faux Reporter tries to argue that UAW autoworkers earn almost 2.5 times what other worker make, but that is a frankly, a load of Crap - it's not a $70/hr to $27/hr ratio - it's more like $30 to $27 (Between Chrysler and Toyota workers). The New York Post (which is owned by Rupert Murdoch likeh Fox News)gets the $70 is by including all of the Health Care Costs for the Retirees, not the currently active workforce. If you want to take away the Healthcare for all the guys who worked their entire LIFE to earn it - you'd finally reach the "Enough" point for these vultures.

Also, If we had Universal Healthcare, that burden on top of the Big 3 would be GONE!!

Vyan

Monday, February 16

House GOP Dances and Fiddles while the Economy Burns

This just from Eric Cantor Useless Tool House Republican Whip.



Yes, they're serious.

Seriously deluded.

The House Bill was not "written in Secret" it went through the Rule Committe as detailed recently by Rep. Louise Slaughter.

The bill, as it came to the Rules Committee, the last stop before the floor vote, already incorporated 12 Republican amendments. The Rules Committee then added the 11 amendments: 6 Democratic and 5 Republican, in addition to a complete Republican substitute, and a motion to recommit. They were unable to muster the votes necessary and lost on bipartisan votes. House Republicans may have come together to vote against the final bill, but they split on their own amendments with 40 to 60 Republicans voting with Democrats. Some Republicans even voted against their party’s alternative bill, and it failed on the floor.

The Republican alternative didn’t have a final price tag, consisted entirely of tax cuts, and would actually raise taxes for 26 million American families. In two years, the Democratic bill would create 3.6 million jobs. The Republican substitute: 1.2 million – a third as many as the Democratic bill that passed the House.


There is no money for ACORN.




MSNBC's Shuster to GOP strategist: "There was no money for ACORN [in the stimulus bill], Doug. You guys know better than that."


The money to replenish the Federal Auto Fleet is to replace them with Fuel Efficient Cars, which will help with reducing our dependance on foreign oil, while creating an immediate demand and market for these cars with auto manufacturers - which in turn will help bring the price of these cars down for consumers. It's a three-way WIN!



Repubs claim the bill is "Pork Barrel", and say it should have more "Shovel-ready" projects - but then when you ask for specifics they actually support those projects because they involve building infrastructure. Someone should tell them - The Reason their weren't as many Infrastructure Projects - is BECAUSE THEY INCLUDED SO MANY TAX CUTS - which the Republicans claim to like also. It's fracking nuts!

I have a better Aerosmith Song for Cantor and all the corporate and Oil Lobbyists who are holding his leash.

EAT THE RICH - cuz they plump when you cook 'em.

Vyan

Thursday, February 12

Conservative Gunman Committed Terrorism Against Liberals

In his statement to the court upon sentencing, the Knoxville Tennessee shooter who killed 2 and wounded 4 people in a Unitarian Church reveals why he did it - to kill those Damn Dirty Liberals. (Full PDF)

"Know this if nothing else: This was a hate crime. I hate the damn left-wing liberals. There is a vast left-wing conspiracy in this country & these liberals are working together to attack every decent & honorable institution in the nation, trying to turn this country into a communist state. Shame on them....



Echoing Palin and Joe the-Unlicenced-Not-A-War-Correspondant Plumber and their hateful "Socialist" talk, this man truly believed that he was the first footsoldier in a war to take America back from The Hated Left.

And guess who wrote his hit-list for him?

Local News Coverage of Sentencing for James Adkisson:


More from "the Manifesto"
"This was a symbolic killing. Who I wanted to kill was every Democrat in the Senate & House, the 100 people in Bernard Goldberg's book. I'd like to kill everyone in the mainstream media. But I know those people were inaccessible to me. I couldn't get to the generals & high ranking officers of the Marxist movement so I went after the foot soldiers, the chickenshit liberals that vote in these traitorous people. Someone had to get the ball rolling. I volunteered. I hope others do the same. It's the only way we can rid America of this cancerous pestilence."

"I thought I'd do something good for this Country Kill Democrats til the cops kill me....Liberals are a pest like termites. Millions of them Each little bite contributes to the downfall of this great nation. The only way we can rid ourselves of this evil is to kill them in the streets. Kill them where they gather. I'd like to encourage other like minded people to do what I've done. If life aint worth living anymore don't just kill yourself. do something for your Country before you go. Go Kill Liberals.


Here we have O'Reilly and Bernard Golberg threatening to assult Media Matters - for merely documenting things they really did say!



O'Reilly: "I want to send them a cake, but I want something to be inside the cake, and I might be put in prison if that happens."


Here's Goldberg again, suggesting that O'Reilly should go down the the New York Times with a Baseball bat.



Bernard Goldberg: If NY Times attacked me like it attacks O'Reilly, "I probably would have gotten a baseball bat and gone down to the New York Times with it and found the person that wrote the editorial, but that's me."


Yeah, well it's not like someone like O'Reailly might ever really fly completely off the handle. Well, almost:



Besides O'Reilly and Goldberg you also have Ann Coulter who'se suggested in the past torture should be a televised sport, that All Arabs should have bombs dropped on them, and Liberals should be sent to Gitmo.

Which brings me to this week's scandal about No Such Agency [NSA] spying on "Americans." I have difficulty ginning up much interest in this story inasmuch as I think the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, dropping daisy cutters wantonly throughout the Middle East and sending liberals to Guantanamo.


And people wonder why I'm not a big fan of most conservatives.

Frankly, if you've ever watched Fear Factor or Saw - you know that torture already is a national spectator sport.

Throwing out violent threats against Liberals and/or anyone that confronts , threatens or challenges thems is a regular right-wing strategy.

It may be rather easy for fairly rational people to blow-off these types of comments and suggestions of violence against Liberals. There is of course, the Free Speech defense - but I do recall almost 20 years ago when the right-wing certainly didn't much care for the "Free Speech" view.

They completly ignored that idea when the band Body Count led by Ice-T dared to release the song "Cop Killer" (which is actually a statement Against Police Brutality and warning that the Rage in L.A. was rising to the boiling point and the Rodney King Riots), Republicans and members of the Fraternal Order of Police phoned in Death and Bomb Threats against their Record Label forcing them to pull the song from the album with threats of violence.


The criticism escalated to the point where death threats were sent to Warner Bros. Records executives, and stockholders threatened to pull out of the company. According to his own words in his book The Ice Opinion: Who Gives a Fuck? (1994) Ice T decided to remove the song from the album of his own volition. Eventually, the album was re-issued with "Cop Killer" removed. Ice T left the label in 1993, following disputes over the album Home Invasion. The performer stated of the controversy that "When I started out, [Warner] never censored us. Everything we did, we have full control over. But what happened was when the cops moved on Body Count they issued pressure on the corporate division of Warner Bros., and that made the music division, they couldn't out-fight 'em in the battle, so even when you're in a business with somebody who might not wanna censor you, economically people can put restraints on 'em and cause 'em to be afraid. I learned that lesson in there, that you're never really safe as long as you're connected to any big corporation's money."


Ice T Interview from Australian TV exlains what his song was really all about, and you can tell how the interviewer isn't trying to hear him.


Arguably Ice T wasn't speaking literally. He was telling a story - "It's a song from Madman", just like Bob Marley's "I Shot the Sherrif", it's Self-Defense. It was a fantasy - much like Goldberg and the baseball bat. Neither of them is really planning on carrying these actions out, anymore than Dirty Harry or the Terminator are likely to going around shooting people. Ice T has even performed several acting roles as a (non-brutal) police officer himself in films such as New Jack City and NBC's Law and Order. Clearly he knows the difference.

Time and time again prosecutors have refrained from prosecuting musicians (and film-makers) for suggestions of violence, even when people have actually carried out the actions described in their songs and films. (Although they did try to prosecute Ozzy Osborne for "Suicide Solution" and Judas Priest after some young men committed suicide - those cases all failed!) They generally realize, rightly I believe, that such an argument tends to reduce some responsibility, and guilt for the perpatrators themselves. It's allows a killer to use someone else as their scapegoat.

We shouldn't blame Catcher in the Rye for the shooting of Lennon, or the Beatles themselves for the Tate/LaBianca killings.

Common sense needs to apply here.

But what should happen when the perpatrator specifically names the person who inspired his actions, the reason for his targeting of a specific type of individual and both they and their inspirational figure further attempts to incite others to follow in the footsteps of violence against those targets?

We aren't talking about the right of self-defense with James Adkisson, he wasn't being attacked! His actions weren't justified in any manner. But he also admits he was specifically incited to commit Murder for ideological reasons, just like Eric Robert Rudolph who was inspired to Bomb the Atlanta Olympics and Women's Health Clinics by virilent anti-Abortion rhetoric, and Timothy McVeigh was inspired by The Turner Diaries after Waco, the Weapons-Strength Anthrax sent to Pat Leahy and Tom Dashcle or the Fake Anthrax that was sent to Keith Olbermann and Jon Stewart. These action are not completely random. They are intended to intimidate.

At a certain point violent rhetoric crosses the line and is not Art, it's not Humor, it's not Satire, and it's not free speech when it becomes a direct and deliberate incitement to VIOLENCE - At a certain point, It's Terrorism.

Plain and simple.

Vyan

Do you Waste (Waste)
All the time that you have
Do you Take (Take)
Everything you can get
Do you Fake (Fake)
Every feeling you show
Do you Hate (Hate)
Everyone that you know

(Chorus 1)
I can't change you
Unless you change yourself
I can't make you
Into someone you don't wannabe?
Who do you Wannabe?

Will you Fight (Fight)
For what you believe in?
Do you Share (Share)
Everything you don't need?
Do you Make (Make)
All the luck that you get?
Do you Love (Love)
Even those that don't love you?


From the song "Wannabe?" - by ME!

Wednesday, February 11

Justifying the Inexcusable

24 - Split Up and Go After The Family


In this scene from Fox's "24" Jack Bauer talks two FBI agents into helping him kidnap and torture an innocent woman and her 10 month-old in order to get information from her Husband, a traitor Secret Service Agent. We're not talking about torturing some killer or terrorist here - they're talking about torturing A BABY!

But the truth, which so many people fail to realize is there are NO EXCUSES for Torture. None. EVER. Regardless of who it is.

Bauer presents a classic false choice - "Follow your conscience or let the 1st Gentleman Die" which is the same as what Senator Cornyn asked Attorney General Eric Holder: "Assume You Have No Option (other than to use Waterboarding)". You always have a choice, and you're always responsible for your actions. In this case they already had phone records and GPS tracking data they could have used to find the President's Husband in time.

There absolutely was a third and even a forth choice - refusing to DO THE RIGHT THING is not a valid reason for doing the wrong thing.

Holder v Leahy


Holder V Cornyn.


The UN Convention Against Torture, Signed by Ronald Reagan says this:

No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.


The is no wiggle room here, there are no valid excuses or justifications available. It's a crime - Period.

During the Randy Rhodes show I just listened to Pat Leahy discuss how we need a "Truth Commission" to at least found out what happened, while John Conyers says - We Need TO PROSECUTE after release a 400 page document on the various abuses of the Bush Administration (that we know about!)

This week, I released "Reining in the Imperial Presidency," a 486-page report detailing the abuses and excesses of the Bush administration and recommending steps to address them. Arthur Schlesinger Jr. popularized the term "imperial presidency" in the 1970s to describe an executive who had assumed more power than the Constitution allows and circumvented the checks and balances fundamental to our three-branch system of government. Until recently, the Nixon administration seemed to represent a singular embodiment of the idea. Unfortunately, it is clear that the threat of the imperial presidency lives on and, indeed, reached new heights under George W. Bush.

As this report documents, there was the administration's contrived drive to a needless war of aggression with Iraq, based on manipulated intelligence and facts that were "fixed around the policy." There was its politicization of the Justice Department; unconscionable and possibly illegal policies on detention, interrogation and extraordinary rendition; warrantless wiretaps of American citizens; the ravaging of our regulatory system and the use of signing statements to override the laws of the land; and the intimidation and silencing of critics and whistle-blowers who dared to tell fellow citizens what was being done in their name. And all of this was hidden behind an unprecedented veil of secrecy and outlandish claims of privilege.

I understand that many feel we should just move on. They worry that addressing these actions by the Bush administration will divert precious energy from the serious challenges facing our nation. I understand the power of that impulse. Indeed, I want to move on as well -- there are so many things that I would rather work on than further review of Bush's presidency. But in my view it would not be responsible to start our journey forward without first knowing exactly where we are.


We can't "Move On" unless we fully understand where we've been and how to make sure we never go back. We can't afford to sweep all of this under a rug, because we know from doing just that after the Nixon Administration - it just sits there and festers!.

Obama doesn't need to address this, Holder doesn't need to address this - we need an Special Counsel to be appointed in order to do a fair and reasonalble analysis of the Bush Administration Crimes. A Top to Bottom Review - there is no other way, and there is no excuse!

If he doesn't fully investigate and prosecute - we'll be right back here in another 30 or 40 years. No More!

Vyan

Friday, February 6

Obama opens the Whup-Ass Can!!

At the House Democratic Caucus Retreat



Some Great Lines:

Obama: Don't let the Perfect be the enemy of the absolutely neccesary. I found this debt when I showed up - wrapped in a great big bow waiting or me...


It's. About. Fracking. TIME!

For the last two week Republicans have been hammering Obama's Stimulus Plan as being nothing but a pork-barrel spending bill with an average of amount of 2 to 1 in comparitive airtime across nearly all cable networks.

Well, Obama says That's the Point!.

So then you get the argument, 'well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill.' What do you think a stimulus is? That's the whole point," Obama said to laughter.

...

THIS IS NOT A GAME


Spending IS Stimulus.

In this Washington Post editorial Obama lays it out even more.

By now, it's clear to everyone that we have inherited an economic crisis as deep and dire as any since the days of the Great Depression. Millions of jobs that Americans relied on just a year ago are gone; millions more of the nest eggs families worked so hard to build have vanished. People everywhere are worried about what tomorrow will bring.

What Americans expect from Washington is action that matches the urgency they feel in their daily lives -- action that's swift, bold and wise enough for us to climb out of this crisis.


This is our ECONOMIC 9-11 - the time for talk is over - it's time to Git 'er Done!!

Vyan